Gigabyte AORUS FO48U vs Gigabyte M27Q
Detailed head-to-head spec comparison and verdict.
SI Score
Calculated purely from technical specs and community reliability reports.
View Formula Breakdown
OLED provides perfect infinite contrast and true blacks
Good refresh rate for modern console/PC gaming
Standard 92 PPI density
Score reduced due to 3 known community issue(s)
SI Score
Calculated purely from technical specs and community reliability reports.
View Formula Breakdown
IPS provides great color accuracy and viewing angles
Great standard refresh rate for smooth gaming
Great balance of clarity and performance
Score reduced due to 3 known community issue(s)
| Specification | Gigabyte AORUS FO48U | Gigabyte M27Q |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 48" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 2560x1440 |
| Panel Type | OLED | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 170 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.1 ms | 0.5 ms |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 92 | 109 |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2020 |
| Approx. Price (INR) | ₹1,20,000 - ₹1,30,000 | ₹24,000 - ₹28,000 |
| Approx. Price (USD) | $1,500 - $1,600 | $300 - $350 |
The Verdict
The Gigabyte M27Q edges out the competition with better overall specs in our head-to-head comparison.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which monitor is better for gaming: Gigabyte AORUS FO48U or Gigabyte M27Q?
The AORUS FO48U is generally better for gaming due to its faster 0.1ms response time, giving you a smoother competitive edge.
What is the difference in resolution between the AORUS FO48U and M27Q?
The Gigabyte AORUS FO48U has a resolution of 3840x2160, whereas the Gigabyte M27Q features a 2560x1440 resolution. A higher resolution provides a sharper image and more screen real estate.
Which monitor has better pixel density (PPI)?
The M27Q has a higher pixel density of 109 PPI compared to the AORUS FO48U's 92 PPI, resulting in a sharper, crisper image.